June 21st, 2023. Happy Summer Solstice to all Science Goddess readers. It’s the longest day of the year and the moment when the sun stands “still on” the horizon. Many solstices ago I was invited to do an Op-Ed piece for The New York Times in celebration of this cosmic spectacle and I wrote about another cosmic luminance phenomenon that blows many people’s minds.
Everyone ‘knows’ that nothing can go faster than light. It’s one piece of elite physics that’s soaked into our cultural DNA. And it is quite literally true: nothing can go faster than light. In terms of light, nothing is a shadow – for a shadow, by definition, is the absence of light. And shadows can go faster than light. Your brain is possibly already objecting to this claim, so deeply ingrained is the idea of light-speed’s limitation – but read on, because the physics of relativity allows this to happen.
Here’s link my original Times piece. And pasted below is the text, for those who can’t get past the firewall.
*
The Shadow Goes – The New York Times, June 20, 2007.
ON Thursday, on the summer solstice, the Sun will celebrate the year’s lazy months by resting on the horizon. The word solstice derives from the Latin “sol” (sun) and “sistere” (to stand still). The day marks the sun’s highest point in the sky, the moment when our shadows shrink to their shortest length of the year. How strange to think that these mundane friends, our ever-present familiars, can actually go faster than the sun’s rays.
I remarked on this recently to my husband as we sat on the porch with our shadows pooling by our chairs. Nothing can go faster than light, he insisted, expressing what is surely the most widely known law of physics, ingrained into us by a thousand “Nova” programs.
That is the point, I explained: Nothing can go faster than light. A shadow isn’t a thing. It’s a non-thing. It’s the absence of light.
Special relativity dictates that we cannot move anything more quickly than the particles of light known as photons, but no law says you can’t do nothing faster than light. Physicists have known this for a long time, even if they generally do not mention it on PBS documentaries.
My husband looked troubled, as did my sister and some friends I regaled with the story that evening. Like the warp drive on “Star Trek,” faster-than-light travel is supposed to be a science-fiction fantasy. Isn’t it?
They are right about the travel: According to relativity, no physical substance can exceed the speed of light because it would take infinite energy to accelerate anything to such a velocity.
Yet the laws of physics pertain only to that which is. That which isn’t is not bound by relativity’s restraint. From the point of view of relativity, a shadow (having no mass) is a non-thing, an existential void.
It’s quite easy to conjure up a faster-than-light shadow, at least in theory. Build a great klieg light, a superstrong version of the ones set up at the Academy Awards. Now paste a piece of black paper onto the klieg’s glass so there is a shadow in the middle of the beam, like the signal used to summon Batman. And we are going to broadcast our Bat-call out to the cosmos.
Our shadow bat can go 10 times the speed of light or 100 times faster without breaking any of physics’ sacred rules.
The key to our trick is to rotate the klieg. As the light turns, the bat shadow sweeps across the sky. Round and round it goes, projecting into the void. Just as the rim of a bicycle wheel moves faster than its hub, so too, away from the source our bat shadow will fly faster and faster, a consequence of the geometry that guarantees the rim of a really big wheel moves faster than a co-rotating small wheel.
At a great enough distance from the source, our shadow bat will go so fast it will exceed the speed of light. This does not violate relativity because a shadow carries no energy. Literally nothing is transferred. Our shadow bat can go 10 times the speed of light or 100 times faster without breaking any of physics’ sacred rules.
My sister leapt to the heart of this apparent paradox: Why isn’t the light itself traveling faster than the speed of light? Isn’t it also rotating in space? Actually, no. The bulbs that produce the light are spinning, but the light particles leave the source at 186,000 miles a second, the vaunted “speed of light.” Once emitted, the photons continue to travel at this speed directly away from the source. Only the shadow revolves around the great circle. The critical point is that no object, no substance, defies light.
My husband was right to object that you’d need one spectacular klieg to produce a detectable shadow thousands of miles out in space. Still, the theory is sound.
The anthropologist Mary Douglas noted that all systems of categorizing break down somewhere, unable to incorporate certain forms. By standing beyond relativity’s injunction, shadows suggest the limits of all classification schemes, a tension that even modern science cannot completely resolve.
Shadows cannot “go” anywhere at any speed of their own initiative; they have no mass, and no energy. They are hitchhikers riding in the empty boxcars of light trains.
Intriguing! And beautifully explained. It left me wondering: Could this capacity of shadows be used in some way to communicate? To transmit information faster than electromagnetic radiation could carry it? What do you think, Margaret?